Netherlands Charette . . . Group 3
Charrette Group Work
Walcheren Peninsula, The Netherlands
Following the data presented by Arcadis, the global engineering firm discussed previously, and once being able to visit the site had occurred, each of the student groups began their own design process. Each design group was allotted one TU Delft student. The following information below is the completed work from group 3 elaborating the processes in which the final proposal was reached.
Group 3 Design Process:
Through the analysis of Walcheren, a determination was reached that each of the three cities along the coast held a unique historical identity. The analysis of historical data and each town presented specific coastal defense opportunities. The design concept developed from the analysis was that the coastline formed a “pearl necklace”, and that each city represented a larger pearl as well as a specific place in time (Westkapelle representing the past; Zoutelande representing the present and Vlissingen holding the opportunities for the future). Below is a matrix containing compiled data of each of the three towns, which was created through the analysis of group 3’s interpretation.

Figure 1 (The Matrix)
Connecting each city to each other would be strands representing the innovative design strategies to improve the flood protection, ecology, and circulation along the entire coast. The strands would develop a sense of fluidity along the coast. The strands would be slightly altered to meet the protection requirements held by each town in relation to the individual threats as result of the rising sea, subsidence, and natural elements affecting each location. The strands themselves would be interweaving along the coastline uniting the land and sea. The design focused on developing costal defense strategies for each individual town, which together create a continuous defense system along the coastline.
Master Plan
The Master Plan introduces a combination of constructed elements proposed throughout the landscape. These elements, depending on location, hold functional and/or artistic purposes directly related to the town. In order to develop a cohesive coastal defense system, the utilization of both barrier islands and constructed panels are placed along the entire coastline. Depending on the location of determined placement of the elements, the panels and islands are either designed to enhance the coastal defense system or increase the aesthetic value of the coast. The boulevard and bicycle route move fluidly along the entire length of the coast reinforcing the connection of the towns by land while a ferry service would enhance the connection in the sea. The image below is a diagrammatic Master Plan produced by the group, and all of the factors explained above can be located within the context of the surrounding landscape. The elements that are specifically designed and located per town will be elaborated on later in the narrative. The coastal defense system is the one element, which remains constant throughout the entire plan.
Figure 3: Master Plan
The Master Plans developed for each town elaborate in more detail are found in figures 4, 5, and 6 below. Each strand moving through the landscape can be seen as continuous in the design master plan and be comparison in more detail can be distinguished from seeing the town master plans. According to the towns’ master plan, the placement and movement of the constructed and introduced elements is in direct reference to the relationship with the sea and the natural elements affecting town. Each of the plans is labeled to show how each of these elements are connected to one another as moving along the coast.
Figure 4, 5, 6: Plan of Westkapelle, Plan of Zoutelande, Plan of Vlissingen
Coastal defense strand:
Westkapelle
An auxiliary dike would be constructed behind the existing dike, which would allow space between the two for water detention. The detained water would drain into a holding facility below the dike, and would later be pumped either back into the sea or further inland for agricultural purposes.

Figure 8 (Auxiliary Dike and Detention Area with Constructed Wetlands)
Zoutelande
There would be a constructed waterproof wall that would rise up out of the existing dike that would provide more advanced defense against the sea.

Vlissingen
A constructed waterproof wall would rise up out of the existing dike to provide a more advanced defense against the sea.

Figure 11: Constructed Panels in water with floating structures
Ecological Strand:
Westkapelle
The area of detention would be multifunctional in storing both water a creating a wetland landscape in between the dike and the lake.
Zoutelande
The existing nature persevere that is located along the coast would be enhanced and the preservation would continue.
Vlissingen
There would be a floating market and greenhouse located to the west of the harbor. A proposal of a constructed wetland would be located along the coastline west of the entrance of the harbor.
Circulation Strand:
Westkapelle
The existing bike path would be rerouted first over the sea to allow access to the fishing docks, and then come back into the land to the lake. The lake is reminder of a WWII bombing which flooded the town and provoked a sense of fear from the sea, so a bridge proposal was suggested to represent the “rising above the water” feeling by the residents.

Zoutelande
The construction of walkways, which would move adjacent to the groins, extends out to the islands. The bike path would be rerouted to move over sea and land.

Figure 9: Coastal defense system and boardwalks
Vlissingen
The bike path would offer multiple views of both proposals of land and sea.
Appendix 1
Appendix 2
Appendix 3
































